Ooooh, Neat, A Mobile Barcode

Nine Movie PosterI have no idea if this movie is good or not, but I know the poster is NOT good. The movie “9,” which IMDB describes as “a post-apocalyptic nightmare in which all of humanity is threatened” is being promoted in theaters with the poster at left. Theoretically, you are supposed to scan the barcode with your phone and that takes you somewhere fab. Well, it takes you a lot of places and then you end up where you started. Check out this review of the promo. Visually, the barcode is interesting because these barcodes are just creeping into U.S. use, but why not just make the whole thing look better and make whatever I’m clicking through to be worth it.

Apparently, this poster has won some sort of award but that makes me sad. Award for what? Overuse of the glow feature in Photoshop? Most clicks before getting to a relevant destination?

Yet another example of good concept, bad execution.

Email this Post Email this Post

Reunite for Beaver

beaverThis isn’t the whole headline. Read the whole headline here. As my friend John, who sent the link to me, said, “This is the funniest headline I’ve seen in years.”

It’s true that it’s blue, but it’s really funny.

Email this Post Email this Post

I Want President Robot

barack obama wax figurebarack obama animatronic

OK, I used to work there so I have a soft spot in my heart for Disney. However, when they make animatronic figures of living people they just don’t turn out very well.

The picture on the right shows Barack Obama as an animatronic figure in the Hall of Presidents at Walt Disney World. The picture on the left shows the Madam Tussauds wax figure of Barack Obama.  I think the guy on the left looks more like the real guy, no?

Kudos to Disney for bringing history to life but work on those facial features!

Email this Post Email this Post

Orangina Sexy Back

sexy orangina deerSo I just returned from vacation in Paris and the UK. Yes, I am a lucky gal.

Anyway, I was struck by these weird Orangina ads. Each one has a sexualized animal on them. Some are women, like the big-busted deer at left, and some are men. All are physically fit to the extreme and their bodies are human but they have animal hair and animal heads.

Why?

A sexy deer or manly bear isn’t going to make me rush out to spend 2 Euro on a bubbly orange drink but maybe I’m just too American to get it.

These ads were made by an agency called Fred & Farid in Paris.  Check out some other Orangina work here. The TV ads are funnier than the outdoor. I guess you have to see the TV ads to get the context but I didn’t see any TV ads for Orangina while I was there but I sure did see a lot of outdoor. These guys apparently have a thing for sexy animals.

Wish I could get a client like that. So the idea is that there’s this whale that’s a pregnant woman and she’s worried about her weight…

Email this Post Email this Post

Just Another Day In The Southland

stilt people

OK, so normally it’s a freak show down here on Main Street in Santa Monica, but today is freakier than most.  A couple of stilt people showed up to get their picture taken.  Then a clown arrived. Then a gal in a sparkly mini with a hula-hoop showed up.  I can’t wait to see what the afternoon will bring.

Email this Post Email this Post

Who Thought This Was A Good Idea?

Fred Segal logoThe brilliant folks at Bravo think that viewers want to do nothing more than watch sales assistants fight over who can sell the most stuff to people with too much money.  That’s why they are developing a new reality show based on Fred Segal in Santa Monica.  Check out the Hollywood Reporter article here.

Well, I worked in the building next door to Fred Segal in Santa Monica for four years and I went there virtually every day for coffee (the good coffee place AND the good restaurant have since closed). I’d rather watch paint dry.  No, wait, I’d rather get a root canal.  No, wait, I’d rather have surgery with no anesthesia…

Email this Post Email this Post

Free Man?

funny image illustrating global warmingCheck out this article about Freeman Dyson’s position on global warming. His position on global warming is right to Al Gore’s left. Dyson believes that increased levels of carbon dioxide are OK because we can reduce them with carbon-eating trees. Sounds crazy but the guy is very into bio-technology.  I went to school with his youngest daughter and the only thing I remember about their house is that their guest bathroom was entirely purple–right down to a purple sink and toilet.  Faboosh!  Anyway, it seems to me that Dyson and Gore both feel that humans can solve the problem but Dyson believes that the improvement of the human condition in the short term is far more important than improvement of the planet in the long term.  He seems to feel like we (humans) can fix anything that could potentially happen to the planet in the future.  Interesting point, coming from someone who worked on nuclear projects and then came out strongly against nuclear power as used for war.

Email this Post Email this Post

Is Print Dead?

Print Is DeadI just found this article on Gawker about several print celeb’s forays into web publishing.  It doesn’t really give me a lot of new information, and it’s pretty snarky, but I agree that the only way print will survive is if the publishers figure out ways to drive paper readers online and vice versa.  I’ve seen so many magazines close in the kids category that it becomes depressing to think about.  If I were a publisher, I’d integrate website references throughout the print publication and withhold info from the online versions of the mags which will drive folks to the paper version.  This only will work for entertainment and opinion magzines and not news. With news, you have to simply cater to your audience.  I read the WSJ online and have done for years but I know people who only will read the print version. I will always love print and I hope that publishers around the country will innovate.

Email this Post Email this Post

How Green is Green?

Oscar TshirtThis weekend, I read this article in Sunday’s New York Times about the two green inaugural balls taking place in Washington tonight. The gist of the article is that they were competing for attention from the lefty Dems who support the green cause. I like Al Gore as much as the next gal but I think it’s naive to characterize big business as universally bad. The Al Gore Ball (for lack of a better term) is critical of the other one, which we’ll call the Big Biz Ball (for lack of a better term) because the latter one has sponsors like Exxon Mobile. The Big Biz Ball is going to give Ed Norton an award. Turns out Ed Norton’s family has been working for the green cause for as long, if not longer, than Al Gore. Check out this article in the December issue of Fast Company about his family’s foundation, called Enterprise Community Partners. Turns out this org is responsible for the low-income-housing-tax credit, which allows developers tax credits for creating public housing. This is a big deal. Now, the org is focusing on creating financing solutions for those of us who are less fortunate. IMHO, the vegan food and cheapo decorations of the Al Gore Ball look like fluff versus what the other ball is supporting. Anyway, there shouldn’t be two different balls at all. They should combine forces. So what if Exxon is sponsoring. That means they are supporting the green cause. So what if it’s because they have to. It doesn’t mean that we’re going to allow them to drill in new places in Alaska. Come on, people! This country works because our economy is open and it promotes successful businesses. I think we can be lefties and still believe that big business and big money can improve the lives of lots of people. I’m all for individuals reducing their own carbon footprint but if a multi-million dollar company can affect the lives of thousands of people thats BETTER than my individual effort.

Email this Post Email this Post

Matthews and Olberman OUT as Anchors

No Censorship imageKeith Olberman and Chris Matthews no longer will be anchoring MSNBC’s news coverage. They will be replaced by David Gregory and the two journalists will be used as commentators. The reason behind the change is that the net feels they were too opinionated, to the left, during the Republican National Convention. Um, has anyone watched Fox news lately? Even Brian Williams gets in a righty comment every once in awhile. I bet I can tell you 90% of every journalist’s voting record. Humans are subjective. What’s wrong with a little left-leaning editorializing?? I just returned from Europe and if you watch CNN international the anchors are CLEARLY pro-Republican. It seems like censorship to me that they have removed these guys from their positions. What the Republicans are good at, and the Democrats are terrible at, are organizing and vocalizing around a cause. They get results. SOMEONE in the media should make a BIG deal about this. It’s just wrong.

Email this Post Email this Post